Items must be returned in original, as-shipped condition with all original packaging. Your purchases also help protect forests, including trees traditionally used to make instruments. We understand the importance of online privacy and are committed to complying with the EU General Data Protection Regulation.
To reflect our commitment, we updated our terms and conditions. By continuing to use Reverb, you agree to these updates, and to our cookie policy. Learn More. Used — Mint. Add to Cart. Shipped From. But if the sounds were licensed, then why is it not stated? I don't think we users should accept that we do not know if we buy copyright infringing samples or not. I'll be interested to hear if other has some first hand experience regarding the legal copyright issues as I outlined above.
I'll also welcome the sample pack creators perspective on this, specifically the legal side of acquiring a license vs not. In Roland Corporation v. Post Thu Apr 25, am Difficult territory Extracting samples from a ROM may be different than recording it. Copyrights does not last forever. Without being an advocate or having permissions I would be careful with reselling. It was a pretty OK workstation synth for its time but today most people consider the SY77 and the SY99 that preceded it to be much cooler as they actually have two complete updated DX7II synthesizer engines inside.
Post Thu Apr 25, pm Oh there was a question for me there as well, ok: 1. Again, I discussed this with the founders of the Fairlight CMI including Peter Vogel and they were all thumbs up and very excited about the idea.
This happened already back in The whole idea was a positive thing for Fairlight and PVI now not active companies any longer sadly afaik as they wanted more eyes on what they'd done as they were currently developing the iPad and iPhone apps. As for all other samples I recorded and included I contacted all parties involved and there were no problems there either. And an accusation as well? Not so cool, please gather the correct information please. Bonus info; during this long journey I've discovered Fairlight CMI waveforms that also were included by Roland already in the U, the JV and many many more machines.
The Fender Stratocaster is included in each and every machine or software package ever released with sampling or ROM banks. As for these particular drum machines they became "staple" sounds that everyone wanted so they are probably included in every sample based software and hardware item ever released after say I could probably write a book about sample sourcing as I have owned just about every synthesizer and drum machine ever released.
If we then look at Reason itself it includes sound libraries from Elab, for instance, a company creating sound libraries ever since the late 80s under other company names sampling drum loops from classic records and rebuilding these so they aren't so easy to recognise. I personally know Erik as well as we once both worked at Keyboard City, two of the finest shops in Sweden for synths and samplers that were active from about to Sweden is a small country so we all know about each other here.
Erik is a genius with sampling and editing so nothing wrong there but if you want the roots of the boots info about sampling I know literally everything about the subject. Last edited by bitley on Thu Apr 25, pm, edited 1 time in total. Post Thu Apr 25, pm Yeah my dad has the original Fairlight samples somewhere.
Got them a long-ass time ago, but I remember them being super cool about him using them for libraries. I guess they're just that kind of company! It really is just a case by case thing. I don't think there's a single rule or precedent that says it is or isn't okay. As an example; I remember contacting Toontrack long after Superior Drummer 1 was discontinued to ask if I could use it to program drums in construction kit loop packages where the stems would be supplied separately but no individual hits.
The answer was a resounding "no". Kinda sucked, AND I've heard plenty of sample packs that use those kits - I'd recognise them anywhere. But, that was what I was told so I went with it. Somewhere I have some correspondence from Roland giving me permission to use their sounds in the same way If I was to re-sell the sounds as patches they'd probably not be so happy about it.
Post Thu Apr 25, pm Yes I guess if the AI development creates a true in depth sample analysis engine which finds source sounds even if they're processed with filters, LFOs, envelopes or playing in reverse or any other order where all people of the world can upload their demo tracks and their music from all of their CDs, cassettes, vinyl records, VHS tapes and what not the neural network of interconnecting things will be ridiculously extreme - and after two years of working the machine will come to the conclusion that no multitrack audio recording ever done contains sounds that only exist there.
Because as soon anything is released it will be sampled or borrowed - and this is how it's been since we could press REC as soon as we heard something cool - and this dates back to like more than 60 years.
Beatles probably sampled stuff as well, even though the sampler wasn't invented. Recording something to tape is literally sampling as well. Model-E is triggered Information Would you like to leave your comment? Please Login to your account to leave comments. Don't have an account?
You can create a free account now. Menu Home. Video Tutorials Magazines Literature.
0コメント